redrivercollegegamedevelopmentscandal.ca is a direct and unflinching statement to Red River College's IT department, Game Development faculty, administration, and every staff member or student who played a role in the academic misconduct and discrimination I experienced.
My work was publicly called "elementary" by the same program that refused to review its actual code or infrastructure. I was banned from the Game Development – Programming program after asking standard, reasonable follow-up questions — questions that were met not with answers, but with defensiveness, ridicule, and groupthink from both students and potentially staff.
Representatives of the program doubled down, falsely claiming I was unskilled and unwilling to grow, despite never offering legitimate critique, mentorship, or technical feedback. No one reviewed my source code. No one opened developer tools. They mocked what they didn’t understand.
This website — built using my own custom framework, complete with CDN obfuscation, Firebase-integrated honeypots, and live bot tracking — exists to demonstrate exactly what they tried to erase: not just a student’s potential, but a technical achievement far beyond what the program teaches.
If tracking automated attack patterns, implementing passive infrastructure defense, and designing full-stack behavior analysis systems is "elementary" — then Red River College should reconsider what qualifies them to teach technology at all.
redrivercollegegamedevelopmentscandal.ca exists to document and preserve the academic misconduct, racism, and gatekeeping that took place within Red River College's Game Development – Programming program.
After years of internal complaints and systemic failures, the college removed all traces of the program from its site and online presence. This platform restores that history. It names the individuals involved, archives what was lost, and uplifts the stories of students who were silenced.
We are not a news outlet. This is a counter-record — one that exists because the official one was scrubbed.
Despite being accepted into the Game Development – Programming program, I was later told by Red River College that I was "unskilled" and "unwilling to improve." These are lies. At no point did the faculty or staff provide actionable feedback, mentorship, or review of my work. I asked routine follow-up questions — the kind expected in any learning environment — and was met instead with passive aggression, mockery, and silence.
When my site was brought up, they refused to inspect it beyond surface-level design. No one opened developer tools. No one read the code. Instead, they judged its complexity by appearance alone and collectively decided it was “elementary.” This wasn’t a critique. It was a dismissal rooted in ignorance and bias.
The program’s official Discord server became a hostile space where students and possibly staff grouped together to undermine and humiliate me. After I asked for clarity on the word “preferred” in a tech instruction context, multiple people responded with snide, dismissive remarks, igniting a semantic argument that spanned several individuals and hours. It became clear that this wasn’t confusion — it was coordinated belittlement.
I now believe staff were either involved directly or silently complicit in this public bullying. At no point did any instructor step in to moderate or correct the behavior. Instead, it became an unofficial consensus that I was “difficult” — not because I was wrong, but because I insisted on clarity, accuracy, and standards.
When I was eventually barred from the program, the letter I received claimed I had failed to take advice or show willingness to grow. This is a lie on two levels. First, no constructive feedback was ever offered — not verbally, not in writing, not through coursework. Second, I had repeatedly asked for clarification, for guidance, for technical discussions — all of which were ignored or met with hostility.
The truth is simple: there was no desire to support me. I was treated as an outsider from the start, and once I asked too many questions or refused to tolerate vague instruction, I was discarded. The suggestion that I rejected help is gaslighting — there was no help.
This entire platform — including its design, security systems, CDN obfuscation, Firebase bot tracking, honeypot triggers, and real-time logging — was built by me alone. It reflects not just technical ability, but professional resilience and real-world execution.
If this is “elementary,” then what exactly is Red River College teaching its students? Because from what I’ve seen, their curriculum doesn’t touch what I’ve built here. And if the staff still claim otherwise, they are welcome to try reproducing it from scratch.
This is no longer about whether I was qualified. It’s about how qualified I had to be just to survive the abuse, sabotage, and dismissal I endured.
Everything on this site exists because Red River College tried to silence me. They stripped my enrollment, mocked my skills, and removed traces of the program once scrutiny began. This is my counter-record — not just to document what happened, but to ensure it can never be hidden again.
This is the work they said I was incapable of doing. This is the evidence they refused to review. And this is the reality they will now have to answer to, publicly and permanently.
I do not want — and will not accept — a private settlement in exchange for my silence. Red River College and those involved in this misconduct must take public accountability.
This is no longer about one student. It’s about the systemic racism, exclusion, and cultural dismissal that Indigenous people face in academic and tech spaces. If this institution wants to repair its reputation, it will begin with a public apology and full acknowledgment of what happened — not with a check.
You told me to grow, to take responsibility, to improve. So now I’m telling you: grow up. Take responsibility. Improve. Or stop pretending you represent anything close to equity or professionalism.